Civil Servants' Second Jobs
Call me suspicious, but as sure as slurry runs downhill, I suspect the current row over Greensill and second jobs for civil servants will eventually end up having the biggest impact on those at the bottom of the oven.
The current row started with a former head of Whitehall procurement being revealed to have a "second job" with Greensill Capital. As a result the head of the civil service has ordered Government departments to tell him how many other civil servants have second jobs. I assume the Cabinet Secretary is just interested in "top" civil servants - senior managers with the knowledge and connections to benefit private enterprise.
I really hope this isn't going to be the start of a grand campaign that blusters down to the lowest levels of the civil service.
At the lower grades, some civil servants are so poorly paid that - before the pandemic - they felt the need to take a second job. Others are involved with family businesses and do a bit of work at weekends. Even more civil servants do voluntary work in their spare time. Obviously, the lockdown has put a lot of voluntary activities on hold. But at the same time the pandemic has created the need for more help in the community.
This is all governed by conduct procedures. In HMRC, you were told that if you want to do outside work - even voluntary work - it has to be approved by management. You're told that HMRC has first call on your services, and the external work must be done outside of your contracted hours. Of course you're reminded not to bust the Working Time Directive either!
I don't know if this was the same in all government departments, but HMRC also warned you not to unnecessarily disclose or discuss your position and confine any information about HMRC to that already available to the public.
Above and beyond that, all HMRC staff had to disclose any connection with taxpayers. You were warned not to access the files of anyone you had a personal connection with. That was grounds for dismissal as Gross Misconduct.
On the preventive side this rule was much easier to enforce in the days of paper files, when you could stick a big note on the front saying "This File is NOT TO BE ISSUED to Fred J Muggs." As soon as things went electronic, there was more danger of staff accidentally coming across the file of someone they knew (especially if the files were accessed through reference numbers rather than names). And at the same time it became easier for management to identify illegal access through electronic audit trails.
About five years ago, the procedures on outside work got tighter. I don't know if something had gone wrong somewhere, or if some fast tracker had just "identified a risk" and decided to plug it.
But in addition to having to get permission to work outside, HMRC suddenly decided it needed to get an "Indemnity Waiver" from the employer. So, even though they'd been told not to discuss HMRC, it was now assumed that the staff were going to give tax advice to the second employer. So, HMRC wanted the employer to acknowledge that any advice given by the staff was given in their personal capacity and HMRC would not be liable for any loss suffered as a result of acting on that advice.
Of course, part of the problem for the staff was identifying who should sign the indemnity form - especially if they were doing voluntary work. Quite a lot of HMRC staff seem to volunteer as Scout or Guide or Brownie leaders - I could just imagine Big Chief Brown Owl in London choking, "What is this shit?" as the forms gradually made their way to her desk from all over the country.
So, whatever the outcome of the current outrage, I really hope someone at the top keeps a sense of proportion. The last thing the civil service needs is for time to be eaten up vetting every spare-time job and voluntary activity in the country. The last thing the nation needs - just as lockdown ends - is for the Girl Guides of the country to be deprived of their leaders on the grounds that none may serve two masters.