Boris Johnson's latest challenge to Ministers to cut 91,000 Civil Service jobs continues a trend that strikes at the heart of Britain. Following on from the National Insurance rise clumsily tagged to "supporting the NHS" on payslips, the 91,000 job cuts will supposedly free up cash to tackle the cost-of-living crisis.  As usual, it appeals to a certain mentality. One that used to think most Civil Servants are sitting in Whitehall, clocking up "Gold Plated Pensions" and now think they are sitting at home, "skiving off" (or alternately working hard churning out meaningless red tape, depending on which axe you're grinding). Like the Ministers themselves, that mentality doesn't actually know what the Civil Servants are doing. It doesn't know that a lot of them work outside Whitehall, and it doesn't know that a lot of them are so lowly paid that they qualify for in-work benefits. To be fair though, the Government has been doing its best to...

  Mogg, following in the soggy footsteps of the shoe-chewing Francis Maude, wants to cut civil service jobs. Like most of his ilk, he doesn’t know what those civil servants do, or what the effect of cutting them would be. He just wants them gone. Mogg also thinks everyone should be working in the office. Give him his due – it’s not just the oiks that he wants back in the office – as Father of the House, he ordered MP’s back to Parliament and vetoed online debates, in 2020 when the Pandemic was at its height. The reasons Mogg gave were to  “restore the cut and thrust of debate” and to “set an example to the rest of the country.”  You might ask what kind of example the Commons sets for the country with their “cut and thrust” – or Bash Street Kids barracking – but you can at least see that Mogg is consistent. As a Conservative, he wants things to stay like they’ve always been. So, no surprise that at the end of April, he crept round Civil Service offices leaving “Sorry I Mis...